Is there anyone in the establishment who has the political courage to expose this lien trail?
A lien for delinquent taxes on a property in Fairfax County (Accotink) was sent to Highland County. The lien trail is so secret the property it is placed against is not identified. There are two pretend placements. This is against the law.
On May 11, 2012, the lien was made to appear as if it was placed against assets in the Blue Grass Valley Bank. I had no assets in the Blue Grass Valley Bank. On July 26, 2012, the lien was made to appear as if it was placed against assets in The First and Citizen's Bank. I had no assets in The First and Citizen's Bank.
This is a "pattern 659" It takes control of my farm. Plant confusion and conflict. Who ever controls the confusion and conflict (the accountants) controls the people and assets that are entanglened. Make the victim appear responsible even though the victim has no control.
Those in control can do most anything they want. They can have a hearing like that in Fairfax County that skips over the accounting and the documents such as a deed. They can skip over everything. They can force a sale and take control of the sale proceeds and never have to show where the money went.
Secrecy is unbelievably tight. You would be hard pressed to find one person in all of Highland County to say anything about this lien. I can’t address the lien and fix what needs fixing when the lien and lien trails are concealed.
The lien is supposed to go to the Highland County Court (The 25th Circuit Court of Virginia, Chief Judge Malfourd W. Trumbo). If it didn't go to the Court it's not legal.
History suggests pattern 659 could be used to take control of anyone's property in Virginia and no one will stop them. This is not the rule of law. This is the rule of power and secrecy. I don't understand why good people like Governor Terry McAuliffe, Senator Mark Warner, and Senator Tim Kane, are silent. Is Virginia to protect the fraud or the public?
Take farm in Highland County
2012.07.31 5:25pm (TACS to Trustee)
I am John Rife, a Partner with Taxing Authority Consulting Services. Our firm has been retained by Fairfax County to collect on certain delinquent real estate taxes. If you have retained an attorney to represent the Trust
in this regard, please forward this communication to him or her and notify me of their contact information and
my communication will be directed only to your representative,
Thc property for which you arc listed as a Trustee (Tax Map 0904-01-0017) is delinquent in taxes dating back
to 2010. The amount of delinquent taxes due is $27,718.72 through today. The lien issued was issued against
any funds held, due and owing in the Trust name. In Virginia, a local government and its attorneys have
administrative collection remedies available without having to resort to court action to collect on funds due.
This effort has thus far been unsuccessful.
As you are the Trustee of this Trust and its property, I would like to ascertain your intentions in keeping the
property and paying the taxes due on the property? 1 wanted to speak with you in this regard as it is my client's direction to collect the outstanding amount due and it is my obligation to advise them on their
respective rights and abilities to collect such amounts from the Trust.
You have, however, made it clear to my Special Procedures Manager that you do not wish to speak with me.
1 will, in such case, let you know my intention. In the event you and my client are not able to arrange an
amicable plan to pay the delinquent taxes due on your account, 1 will recommend my client permit mc to take
such actions necessary to collect the delinquent real estate taxes due against the aforementioned property,
including seeking a sale of the property for the delinquent taxes as permitted under Virginia Code Sec 58.1 -
3965, et seg. This procedure would involve a court action against the Trust and would name you as Trustee.
The issues to be discussed at the hearing , however, would be limited to the taxes due on the property and
whether those are delinquent sufficient to entertain the decree of sale. It would be my preference that we
discuss a payment plan amount that best suits the Trust's ability to pay so that the property may bc retained.
Please give me a call at your leisure to discuss what options we may explore. My direct line is 804-53.5
Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter,
John A. Rife, partner
Taxing Authority Consulting Services, PC
Post Office Box 1270
Midlothian, Virginia 23 113
(804) 545- 2379 Direct Phone
(703) 880- 1078 General Collections
(804) 545. 2378 Fax
Hearing precedence - Take Accotink in Fairfax County with a hearing.
(Judge Smith to Trustee, November 27, 2012)
Anthony O'Connell, Trustee
439 South Vista Del Rio
Green Valley, AZ 85614
RE: In Re: Harold A O'Connell, CL-2012-13064
Dear Mr. O'Connell:
I have received your letter regarding the Notice of Scheduling Conference you
received in case CL 2012 -0013064. Th,is is indeed a valid notice from our court .'
provided. so that you would be aware of a Scheduling Conference at which we will, if" .
appropriate, set a trial date and enter a scheduling order in accordance with the Uniform
Pretrial Scheduling Order adopted by the Supreme Court of Virginia. No evidence will
be taken at that time as this is only a hearing to establish the schedule for the orderly
processing of the case.
As for accountability for the notice, it clearly indicates that it is sent by the judges
of the circuit court and provides you with a phone number at which you can contact our
case management staff with regard to the Scheduling Conference. We would not send
out a notice indicating that you can contact the judges directly as such contact is
Your letter alsoindicates that you do not know what issues are raised in the case
but our records indicate that you have responded to the Complaint which sets out the
Plaintiff's allegations and prayer for relief so I therefore assume that you are acquainted
with the issues which have been raised. As to whether the Plaintiff's allegations are
true or merit relief, these issues will not be dealt with at the December 4,2012
Scheduling Conference but are instead decided in the course of later proceedings or
after a trial at which each side has had an opportunity to present evidence in the form of
documents or testimony and make arguments as to the proper disposition of the issues.
You also request that our court take certain actions, but please note that Judges
take actions based upon pleadings which are properly filed, and even then, only after
each interested party has had an opportunity to respond and be heard on the request.
Sending a letter to a judge is not filing a pleading in a case as pleadings are properly
filed with the Clerk of Court. Additionally, copies of anything sent to the Court for filing
must be provided to all other interested parties. As your letter does not indicate copies
were sent to the other parties I will provide them with a copy of your letter and this
Finally, with regard to your participation in the Scheduling Conference at 8:30
a.m. on December 4,2012, this is a civil case and it is your choice as to whether you
participate in this administrative hearing or any further hearings. If you do not appear,
the Court will proceed to establish scheduling without your input. We will, however,
send you a copy of any Order that is entered at that hearing .
Sincerely Yours, Dennis J. Smith (seal)
Cc: Jean Mary O'Connell Nader
Anthony Miner O'Connell
Sheila A. O'Connell
Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh, Esquire